Review




Structured Review

Northern Digital optotrak motion analysis kinematic data
Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. <t>Optotrak</t> marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.
Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic Data, supplied by Northern Digital, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/optotrak+motion+analysis+kinematic+data/optotrak+3020/pmc05826770-101-0-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
optotrak motion analysis kinematic data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation"

Article Title: Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation

Journal: Cerebellum (London, England)

doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0879-0

Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. Optotrak marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.
Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. Optotrak marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.

Techniques Used: Blocking Assay, Control, Marker

Related Articles

Blocking Assay:

Article Title: Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation
Article Snippet: with one leg on each treadmill belt, wore a safety harness, and held onto a handrail in front of the treadmill for all phases of the experiments. .. Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic data were collected during walking at 100 Hz using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada). .. Infrared-emitting markers were placed bilaterally on the fifth metatarsal head (toe), lateral malleolus (ankle), lateral femoral epicondyle (knee), gr

Control:

Article Title: Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation
Article Snippet: with one leg on each treadmill belt, wore a safety harness, and held onto a handrail in front of the treadmill for all phases of the experiments. .. Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic data were collected during walking at 100 Hz using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada). .. Infrared-emitting markers were placed bilaterally on the fifth metatarsal head (toe), lateral malleolus (ankle), lateral femoral epicondyle (knee), gr

Marker:

Article Title: Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation
Article Snippet: with one leg on each treadmill belt, wore a safety harness, and held onto a handrail in front of the treadmill for all phases of the experiments. .. Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic data were collected during walking at 100 Hz using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada). .. Infrared-emitting markers were placed bilaterally on the fifth metatarsal head (toe), lateral malleolus (ankle), lateral femoral epicondyle (knee), gr



Similar Products

90
Northern Digital optotrak motion analysis kinematic data
Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. <t>Optotrak</t> marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.
Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic Data, supplied by Northern Digital, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/optotrak+motion+analysis+kinematic+data/optotrak+3020/pmc05826770-101-0-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
optotrak motion analysis kinematic data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. Optotrak marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.

Journal: Cerebellum (London, England)

Article Title: Making sense of cerebellar contributions to perceptual and motor adaptation

doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0879-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental paradigm and setup for part one of the experiment. A: Experimental paradigm. White blocks indicate tied-belt walking (both legs 0.4 m/s), light gray blocks indicate split-belt walking (0.4:0.8 m/s), and dark gray blocks indicate the leg speed perception task (see Methods for task details). Participants performed three baseline walking and leg speed perception tasks, followed by 15 minutes of split-belt adaptation. Two-thirds of the way through the adaptation block, there was a 10 second “catch” trial where belts returned to tied-belt conditions. After adaptation, participants performed six leg speed perception tasks separated by five tied-belt walking blocks of increasing length. B: Leg speed perception task setup. Participants were asked to walk on the treadmill and use a keypad to actively control the speed of the right leg to match that of the left leg, which was fixed at 0.4 m/s. Optotrak marker locations are indicated by blue circles. Participants wore headphones that played white noise to cancel auditory treadmill cues and a cloth drape to eliminate visual cues of the feet.

Article Snippet: Optotrak Motion Analysis Kinematic data were collected during walking at 100 Hz using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada).

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Control, Marker